腹腔镜辅助下阴式全子宫切除术与腹式全子宫切除治疗子宫良性病变的效果及对盆底功能的影响比较

摘要
图/表
参考文献(21)
相关文章 (15)

全文: PDF (652 KB) HTML (1 KB)
输出: BibTeX | EndNote (RIS)

摘要目的比较腹腔镜辅助下阴式全子宫切除术与腹式全子宫切除治疗子宫良性病变的效果及对盆底功能的影响。方法选择2016年3月～2017年3月南京市妇幼保健院妇科收治的130例子宫良性病变患者，依据随机数字表法将其随机分为两组，每组65例。对照组患者采取腹式全子宫切除术，观察组患者采取腹腔镜辅助下阴式全子宫切除术进行治疗。对两组患者手术情况、性生活质量、应激指标及盆底功能障碍发生率进行比较分析。结果观察组术中出血量较对照组明显减少（P ＜ 0.05）；手术时间、排气时间及下床活动时间均较对照组明显缩短（P ＜ 0.05）。治疗后观察组女性性功能指数量表总分较对照组明显提高（P ＜ 0.05），焦虑自评量表评分较治疗前和对照组明显降低（P ＜ 0.05）。治疗后观察组白细胞计数和血清皮质醇、白介素-6、C反应蛋白水平均较对照组明显降低（P ＜ 0.05）。两组盆底功能障碍发生率比较，差异无统计学意义（P ＞ 0.05）。结论腹腔镜辅助下阴式全子宫切除术可明显减少子宫良性病变患者的术中出血量，缩短手术时间及下床活动时间，缓解焦虑情绪、应激反应。

	服务

	把本文推荐给朋友
	加入我的书架
	加入引用管理器
	E-mail Alert
	RSS
	作者相关文章
	徐璞马洁桦张蕾

关键词 ：子宫良性病变, 腹腔镜辅助下阴式全子宫切除术, 腹式全子宫切除术, 临床疗效, 盆底功能

Abstract：Objective To compare the clinical efficacy of laparoscopic assisted vaginal hysterectomy and abdominal hysterectomy in the treatment of benign uterine lesions and its influence on the pelvic floor function. Methods One hundred and thirty cases of patients with benign uterine lesions admitted to Department of Gynecology, Nanjing Maternity and Child Health Hospital from March 2016 to March 2017 were selected and divided into two groups by random number table, with 65 cases in each group. The control group was given abdominal hysterectomy, while the observation group was given laparoscopic assisted vaginal hysterectomy. The operative conditions, sexual quality of life, stress indexes and incidence of pelvic floor dysfunction of patients in the two groups were compared and analyzed. Results After treatment, intraoperative blood loss of observation group were less than the control group, the operative time, postoperative exhaust time and postoperative activity time in observation group were shorter than the control group, the differences were statistically significant(P ＜ 0.05). The total score of female sexual function index in observation group was higher than the control group, the difference was statistically significant (P ＜ 0.05), the scores of self-rating anxiety scale in observation group were lower than those before treatment and the control group, the differences were statistically significant(P ＜ 0.05). After treatment, the white blood cell count and the levels of serum cortisol, interleukin-6 and C-reactive protein in observation group were lower than the control group, the differences were statistically significant (P ＜ 0.05). There were no statistically significant differences on the incidence of pelvic floor dysfunction between the two groups (P ＞ 0.05). Conclusion Laparoscopic assisted vaginal hysterectomy can effectively reduce intraoperative blood loss, shorten the operative time and postoperative activity time, relieve anxiety and stress response.

Key words： Benign uterine lesions Laparoscopic assisted vaginal hysterectomy Abdominal hysterectomy Clinical efficacy Pelvic floor function

基金资助:国家自然科学基金青年项目（81501239）。

作者简介: 徐璞（1975.10-），女，副主任医师；研究方向：子宫肌瘤、卵巢肿瘤、异位妊娠。

引用本文:

徐璞马洁桦张蕾. 腹腔镜辅助下阴式全子宫切除术与腹式全子宫切除治疗子宫良性病变的效果及对盆底功能的影响比较[J]. 中国医药导报, 2017, 14(24): 110-113.
XU Pu MA Jiehua ZHANG Lei. Comparative study on the clinical efficacy of laparoscopic assisted vaginal hysterectomy and abdominal hysterectomy in the treatment of benign uterine lesions and its influence on the pelvic floor function. 中国医药导报, 2017, 14(24): 110-113.

链接本文:

http://www.yiyaodaobao.com.cn/CN/ 或 http://www.yiyaodaobao.com.cn/CN/Y2017/V14/I24/110

[1] King CR，Giles D. Total laparoscopic hysterectomy and laparoscopic-assisted vaginal hysterectomy [J]. Obstet Gynecol Clin North Am，2016，43（3）：463-478.
[2] 杨春红，岳瑛.腹腔镜治疗子宫肌瘤的研究进展[J].中国妇幼保健，2013，28（10）：1685-1687.
[3] 熊红莲，姜艳朋，韩磊，等.腹腔镜手术在子宫内膜异位症治疗中的应用进展[J].检验医学与临床，2015，12（14）：2124-2126.
[4] Takeda A，Hayashi S，Imoto S，et al. Gasless single-port laparoscopic-assisted vaginal hysterectomy for large uteri weighing 500g or more [J]. Eur J Obstet Gynecol Reprod Biol，2016，203：239-244.
[5] Takeda A，Yamase Y，Koike W，et al. Pulmonary thromboembolism as a result of ovarian vein thrombosis after laparoscopic-assisted vaginal hysterectomy for uterine myoma [J]. J Obstet Gynaecol Res，2016，42（6）：743-747.
[6] 刘芳，文仲勇.腹腔镜辅助下阴式全子宫切除术中盆底重建的临床研究[J].中国临床研究，2014，27（7）：833-835.
[7] 张汉英，张利，张惠煊.不同术式全子宫切除的临床效果分析[J].中国妇幼保健，2014，29（25）：4057-4060.
[8] 朱盈，李婷.不同途径全子宫切除术对女性性生活质量的影响[J].现代妇产科进展，2014，23（12）：990-992.
[9] Park JY，Nho J，Cho IJ，et al. Laparoendoscopic single-site versus conventional laparoscopic-assisted vaginal hysterectomy for benign or pre-invasive uterine disease [J]. Surg Endosc，2015，29（4）：890-897.
[10] 聂夏子，刘钰，曲波，等.腹腔镜保留盆腔自主神经的广泛性子宫切除术治疗早期宫颈癌的研究进展[J].医学综述，2015，21（10）：1786-1788.
[11] 吴海燕，李艳红，张欣宁，等.改良腹腔镜辅助下阴式全子宫切除术40例临床治疗效果分析[J].中国实用医药，2016，11（18）：63-64.
[12] Hayden JM，Oras J，Karlsson OI，et al. Post-operative pain relief using local infiltration analgesia during open abdominal hysterectomy：a randomized，double-blind study [J]. Acta Anaesthesiol Scand，2017，61（5）：539-548.
[13] Janda M，Gebski V，Davies LC，et al. Effect of total laparoscopic hysterectomy vs total abdominal hysterectomy on disease-free survival among women with stage Ⅰ endometrial cancer：a randomized clinical trial [J]. JAMA，2017， 317（12）：1224-1233.
[14] 侯红波，王辉，陈颖.基层医院应用单级和双级行腹腔镜子宫切除术140例分析[J].转化医学电子杂志，2016， 3（11）：47-48.
[15] 刘帅，刘颖，李万珍，等.单孔腹腔镜辅助阴式子宫切除术与阴式子宫切除术的临床应用比较[J].中国医药导报，2015，12（24）：127-131.
[16] Lawson EH，Wright VJ，Francone TD. Robotic total abdominal hysterectomy with bilateral salpingo-oophorectomy and low anterior resection with transvaginal specimen extraction and intracorporeal colonic J-pouch construction：a multidisciplinary approach [J]. Dis Colon Rectum，2017，60（3）：353.
[17] Selvaraj V. Evaluation of clonidine as an adjuvant to bupivacaine in wound infiltration for providing postoperative analgesia after abdominal hysterectomy [J]. Anesth Essays Res，2016，10（3）：408-413.
[18] 闵霞，何花，陶爱琴，等.循证护理对腹腔镜辅助下阴式全子宫切除术患者康复和生活质量的影响[J].现代中西医结合杂志，2014，23（32）：3631-3633.
[19] 周艳敏.研究腹腔镜下子宫切除术与开腹子宫切除术的疗效[J].实用妇科内分泌杂志，2015，2（4）：99-102.
[20] 陶平，冯倩，迟晓阳.子宫腺肌症子宫切除围手术期的护理[J].转化医学电子杂志，2016，3（8）：69-70.
[21] 王小玉，吴大保.不同术式对子宫切除术后患者机体应激的影响[J].安徽医学，2015，36（7）：832-834.