Establishment of evaluation for the quality of clinical pressure sore nursing based on Donabedian theory
YANG Yi1 YANG Xiaoying2 YU Mei2
1.Nursing Department, Civil Aviation General Hospital, Beijing 100123, China;
2.Department of Spine, the 309th Hospital of Chinese People's Liberation Army, Beijing 100123, China
Abstract：Objective To explore the evaluation for the quality of clinical pressure sore nursing based on Donabedian theory. Methods Delphi method was adopted in this study. Through 2-round of consultation, the general evaluation for the quality of clinical pressure sore nursing was built up by 26 experts. Results The effective rates for the experts′ questionnaire consultation in 2 rounds were 92.30% and 100.00% respectively; the variation coefficient in first round was between 0.121-0.163 and in second round was between 0.073-0.184; the determination coefficient was 0.839, the familiar coefficient was 0.847 and the degree of authority coefficient was 0.843. The Kendall coefficients were 0.541 and 0.743, and it showed that the experts had an high agreement with the system. The structure-process-outcome system includes 3 primary indicators, 15 secondary indicators and 32 tertiary indicators. Conclusion High representativeness and dependability is proved by the results of experts' consultation such as active coefficient, variation coefficient and authority coefficient. The clinical pressure sore nursing evaluation system in this study is conductive to continuous improvement of clinical pressure sore nursing.
杨毅1 杨小莹2 于梅2. 基于Donabedian理论构建的临床压力性损伤护理质量评价体系[J]. 中国医药导报, 2018, 15(20): 137-140.
YANG Yi1 YANG Xiaoying2 YU Mei2. Establishment of evaluation for the quality of clinical pressure sore nursing based on Donabedian theory. 中国医药导报, 2018, 15(20): 137-140.
[1] Donabedian A. Evaluating the quality of medical care [J].华西医学，2016，31（9）：1496.
[2] Donabedian A. The quality of care.How can it be assessed? [J]. JAMA，1998，260（12）：1743-1748.
[3] 刘敏杰，张兰凤，叶赟，等.结构-过程-结果模式在护理质量评价中的应用进展[J].中华护理杂志，2013，48（4）：371-374.
[4] 郭欣，陈赟，施雁.基于Donabedian质量理论构建的护理质量评价标准之间影响关系的研究现状[J].护理学杂志，2014，29（9）：92-94.
[5] 李英华，王秀英，刘宇，等.中文版延续护理测评量表的信度、效度研究[J].中国护理管理，2014，14（9）：919-922.
[6] 徐霞，刘娜，李秀珍.个体化护理干预对颈椎骨折伴高位截瘫患者压疮预防管理的影响[J].护士进修杂志，2017， 32（8）：752-753.
[7] The National Pressure Ulcer Advisory Panel. National Pressure Ulcer Advisory Panel （NPUAP）announces a change in terminology form pressure ulcer to pressure injury and updates the stages of pressure injury[EB/OL].（2016-04-13）[2016-06-13].http//www.npuap，org/national-pressure-ulcer-advisory-panel-npuap-announce-a-chang-in-terminology-from-pressure-ulcer-to-pressure-injury-and-updates-the-stages-of-pressure-injury/.
[8] Raju D，Su X，Patrician PA，et al. Exploring factors associated with pressure ulcers：a data mining approach [J]. Int J Nurs Stud，2015，52（6）：102-111.
[9] 葛勇.骨科压疮高危人群的压疮预防及护理体会[J].世界最新医学信息文摘，2015，15（72）：233.
[10] 朱大茹，刘晓玲，吴筱枚，等.皮肤护理学组在压疮管理中的运行效果[J].护理实践与研究，2017，16（6）：124-126.
[11] 蒋琪霞，李国宏，刘海英，等.减压床垫结合不同翻身频率用于重症患者预防压疮的多中心研究[J].医学研究生学报，2017，30（1）：77-79.
[12] 李影，张锦锦，冯杰，等.规范化压疮护理体系的构建[J].护士进修杂志，2017，32（5）：388-390.
[13] Wiison S，HauckY，Bremner A，et al. Developing indicators of nursing quality to evaluate nurse staffing ratios [J]. J Clin Nurs，2012，21（11/12）：1594-1605.
[14] 李兆霞，何平平，梁雅琴，等.德尔菲法在研制冠心病经皮冠状动脉介入治疗术后患者赋权护理评价工具中的应用[J].中国实用护理杂志，2017，32（5）：388-390.
[15] 吴颖颖，岳爱学，何佳倩，等.基于德尔菲法慢性心力衰竭患者多元文化护理宣教方案构建[J].中国医药导报，2017，14（29）：115-118.
[16] 刘晓，何桂娟，俞梦盈，等.基于循证方法和德尔菲专家咨询法构建老年护理院护理安全质量敏感性指标[J].护理研究，2017，31（28）：3670.
[17] 陈璐，奚兴.基于三维质量结构评价延伸护理服务质量的研究[J].中国护理管理，2015，15（6）：713-714.
[18] 何成雨，甘秀妮，王小琳，等.基于德尔菲法和层次分析法构建冠心病患者PCI术后延续护理成效评价指标[J].中华现代护理杂志，2018，24（3）：249-251.
[19] 刘英，都燕平，徐少娜.一体化管理在高危压疮患者中的实施[J].护理管理杂志，2015，15（1）：55-56.
[20] 彭韫丽，李红燕，逯艳丽.医院压疮管理中护理质量敏感指标的构建与实施[J].中西医结合护理，2018，4（1）：25-27.
[21] 杨宏，李玉红，秦淼，等.综合医院压疮管理现患率调研及预防现状分析[J].护士进修杂志，2015，30（23）：2181-2183.
[22] 王双凤，刘会范，齐艳，等.膀胱镜检查护理质量标准体系的初步构建[J].中国实用护理杂志，2017，33（33）：2615.
2018, Vol. 15 
京公网安备 11010502046598号